[openpgp] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-openpgp-persistent-sy mmetric-keys-02.txt

On 05/11/2025 14:15, Daniel Huigens wrote:
> Yes, makes sense 🙂
> This by itself doesn't fully specify what a PKESK and Signature packet
> with algorithm ID 0 means, and having it in the table could be nice,
> but we could also just put it in the text of course, indeed.

I think drawing a parallel with the SEIPD packet is instructive - the 
SEIPD entry in the packet types registry does not mention either CFB or 
AEAD, that's delegated to the version 1 and version 2 specifications. 
Keeping any explicit mention of "AEAD" out of the public key algorithms 
registry would be consistent with this precedent.

A

_______________________________________________
openpgp mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]