[openpgp] Re: Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-ope npgp-pqc-14: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
"Eric Vyncke \(evyncke\)" <[email protected]> Mon, 15 Dec 2025 15:23:50 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.openpgp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <PH0PR11MB49669C703F22121D408FF043A9ADA@PH0PR11MB4966.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> |
Hello Aron, Thank you for your email. I had a look at the PR and did not find anything related to my DISCUSS point (or was it addressed in another PR ?) See below for more comments, search for EV> Regards -éric PS: cool to have your email PGP encrypted to me and in the clear to the IETF mail archives 😉 On 15/12/2025, 10:48, "Aron Wussler" <[email protected]> wrote: Hi Éric, Than you for the review! We've addressed your concerns in a PR on GitHub [1] that we plan to merge and publish in the next days. > ### Section 2.1 > What is the context for the BCP14 terms in the "Requirement" column ? I.e., is > it for implementation and/or deployment ? Added some context EV> as written above, I fail to see any change in this section. > The term 'composite' in this context was new for me and is only explained at > the end of section 1 :-( unsure how to fix this though. This is quite specific language, and I think it makes sense to keep it there. It is "standard language" for RFC 9794. EV> And I have read the added text, thanks. > ### Section 7.1 > > Why not a MUST in `An implementation SHOULD use AES-256` as it is followed by > `if all recipient certificates indicate support for it` ? > > When can the 2 other "SHOULD" be bypassed ? Please avoid ambiguities per > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/statement-iesg-statement-on-clarifying-the-use-of-bcp-14-key-words/ This is because a MUST implies that a message not using AES-256 is invalid, and it should be rejected on decryption. This MUST cannot be enforced, as the receiving implementation may not have all the certificates of the other recipients available, and can't validate the policy. So it can't properly reject a malformed message. EV> OK but suggest adding this explanation next to the SHOULD [1] https://github.com/openpgp-pqc/draft-openpgp-pqc/pull/253/files _______________________________________________ openpgp mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]