[openpgp] Re: Mike Bishop's No Objection on draft-ietf-ope npgp-pqc-15: (with COMMENT)
Aron Wussler <[email protected]> Wed, 17 Dec 2025 17:03:45 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.openpgp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <-b59IimdaIg2LH5_Z7agaw1nSDI9gLEyfHYNPefbR4hcNcjiafU3wGwEmZ-yKL_YvaC4DQQxX1y8VEObLQv2B4GCrL1pZC8KiHS0tx1p6fY=@wussler.it> |
Hi Mike, Thank you as well for the review! I've just prepared a PR with the changes [1]. > ### Section 3.1, paragraph 2 > `encrypting to different keys if at least one key does not support PQ(/T) encryption schemes.` > "if any key does not support" or "unless all keys support" might be easier to > parse. > > ### Section 8.1, paragraph 1 > `multiple PKESKs if at least one does not use PQ(/T) encryption schemes.` > Similarly, "if any of them do not use" or "unless all of them use" might be easier to parse. Both changed to "unless". > #### Section 1.2.3, paragraph 2 > `- taken into account. We refer to Section 10.1 for a discussion of the - ^^^^ + taken into account. Refer to Section 10.1 for a discussion of the + ^` This is already fixed in version 15 All the other recommendations were implemented in the PR. Cheers, Aron [1] https://github.com/openpgp-pqc/draft-openpgp-pqc/pull/261 -- Aron Wussler Sent with ProtonMail, OpenPGP key 0x7E6761563EFE3930 _______________________________________________ openpgp mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 343 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: ProtonMail wrsEARYKAG0FgmlC4mYJEH5nYVY+/jkwRRQAAAAAABwAIHNhbHRAbm90YXRp b25zLm9wZW5wZ3Bqcy5vcme1nD8OUfEP7DGcNqPzhWGBhUex5Q4H4CMtTk3r p1DbYBYhBIuVslFfa7tqthSdVX5nYVY+/jkwAAD9bgEAsMGYREShhw+CwV2f v9g4fATIxNSFSQkDh9BDm0GRGjMBAOOyb17604b1X2XB+Yjig7YwMVN+Q0AO tWTu67QjEdIG =CdDY -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----