[openpgp] Re: Mike Bishop's No Objection on draft-ietf-ope npgp-pqc-15: (with COMMENT)

Aron Wussler <[email protected]> Wed, 17 Dec 2025 17:03:45 +0000
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.openpgp
Message-ID <-b59IimdaIg2LH5_Z7agaw1nSDI9gLEyfHYNPefbR4hcNcjiafU3wGwEmZ-yKL_YvaC4DQQxX1y8VEObLQv2B4GCrL1pZC8KiHS0tx1p6fY=@wussler.it>
Hi Mike,

Thank you as well for the review!
I've just prepared a PR with the changes [1].

> ### Section 3.1, paragraph 2
> `encrypting to different keys if at least one key does not support PQ(/T) encryption schemes.`
> "if any key does not support" or "unless all keys support" might be easier to
> parse.
> 

> ### Section 8.1, paragraph 1
> `multiple PKESKs if at least one does not use PQ(/T) encryption schemes.`
> Similarly, "if any of them do not use" or "unless all of them use" might be easier to parse.
 

Both changed to "unless".


> #### Section 1.2.3, paragraph 2
> `- taken into account. We refer to Section 10.1 for a discussion of the - ^^^^ + taken into account. Refer to Section 10.1 for a discussion of the + ^`

This is already fixed in version 15


All the other recommendations were implemented in the PR.


Cheers,
Aron

[1] https://github.com/openpgp-pqc/draft-openpgp-pqc/pull/261

--
Aron Wussler
Sent with ProtonMail, OpenPGP key 0x7E6761563EFE3930

_______________________________________________
openpgp mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 343 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: ProtonMail

wrsEARYKAG0FgmlC4mYJEH5nYVY+/jkwRRQAAAAAABwAIHNhbHRAbm90YXRp
b25zLm9wZW5wZ3Bqcy5vcme1nD8OUfEP7DGcNqPzhWGBhUex5Q4H4CMtTk3r
p1DbYBYhBIuVslFfa7tqthSdVX5nYVY+/jkwAAD9bgEAsMGYREShhw+CwV2f
v9g4fATIxNSFSQkDh9BDm0GRGjMBAOOyb17604b1X2XB+Yjig7YwMVN+Q0AO
tWTu67QjEdIG
=CdDY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----