[openpgp] Re: Key Flags subpacket interpretation question
Daniel Kahn Gillmor <[email protected]> Tue, 23 Dec 2025 16:09:57 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.openpgp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thanks Daphne, Andrew, and Wyllys for this discussion about User IDs and
Key Flags. Sorry I'm just catching up on this thread.
On Fri 2025-11-07 12:33:00 -0500, Daphne Shaw wrote:
> So long as the user ID key usage flags (the flags pertaining to the
> primary key) allow for certification (i.e. it's allowed to have
> subkeys at all),
I wanted to note (with no hats on) that i'm not sure Daphne's take on
this is the consensus semantics of the "certification" key usage flag.
As i understand it, the fact that the primary key *is* a primary key is
what allows subkey bindings (and user ID self-sigs, for that matter --
how else would you know what key usage flags are permitted? there's a
chicken and egg problem here if you interpret it the other way).
The certification flag indicates that the key in question is expected to
be used to certify *other* certificates (that is, by adding a
certification signature over someone else's primary key + user ID).
I hope this is a useful contribution!
--dkg
_______________________________________________
openpgp mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]