[openpgp] Re: Ideas for alternative user interface terms for OpenPGP structures

Daniel Huigens <[email protected]> Thu, 26 Feb 2026 18:37:02 +0000
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.openpgp
Message-ID <Kax3AByW70eKguiIXDvGqx5FAm5Kva3PGxGK0ACv8CPZxR16Hibr6Si1QiVhJIJlevrLDyDi1nZj3eKp3Swg7_jcjMhLUDZmhY_sCUZj160=@protonmail.com>
On Thursday, February 26th, 2026 at 18:37, Simo Sorce <[email protected]> wrote:
> Proton Mail tends to self-select more savvy users (for those that are
> interested in the feature) so I would not use it as a metric to
> establish whether these terms are confusing or not.

This isn't really true anymore, we have many casual users nowadays.
That being said, Proton Mail users don't actually need to know about
or do anything with public or private keys in order to use end-to-end
encrypted email.

And that was essentially my larger point: the best way to improve the UX
and prevent mistakes is to handle it for them, rather than worry about
the terminology, because novice users might make mistakes regardless of
which terms we use.

Then, the only people who should have to do anything with OpenPGP keys
manually are more technical users, who hopefully won't be confused
by these terms.

Best,
Daniel

_______________________________________________
openpgp mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]