[openpgp] Re: Ideas for alternative user interface terms for OpenPGP structures
Daniel Huigens <[email protected]> Thu, 26 Feb 2026 18:37:02 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.openpgp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <Kax3AByW70eKguiIXDvGqx5FAm5Kva3PGxGK0ACv8CPZxR16Hibr6Si1QiVhJIJlevrLDyDi1nZj3eKp3Swg7_jcjMhLUDZmhY_sCUZj160=@protonmail.com> |
On Thursday, February 26th, 2026 at 18:37, Simo Sorce <[email protected]> wrote: > Proton Mail tends to self-select more savvy users (for those that are > interested in the feature) so I would not use it as a metric to > establish whether these terms are confusing or not. This isn't really true anymore, we have many casual users nowadays. That being said, Proton Mail users don't actually need to know about or do anything with public or private keys in order to use end-to-end encrypted email. And that was essentially my larger point: the best way to improve the UX and prevent mistakes is to handle it for them, rather than worry about the terminology, because novice users might make mistakes regardless of which terms we use. Then, the only people who should have to do anything with OpenPGP keys manually are more technical users, who hopefully won't be confused by these terms. Best, Daniel _______________________________________________ openpgp mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]