[openpgp] Re: HKP draft TODO items
Songbo Bu <[email protected]> Tue, 26 May 2026 17:10:44 +0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.openpgp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAK08nYYcMArPaJP6G9O5FN_hvU97d5SJKaUtNbm76n++Z00p=Q@mail.gmail.com> |
--===============7678550613293427485== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000007e50930652b4dfe0" --0000000000007e50930652b4dfe0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Andrew, Sorry, my last reply went out in Chinese. What I meant to say was: Thanks, that looks good to me. Treating this as guidance rather than a hard interoperability requirement seems like the right balance, especially for static deployments. I=E2=80=99ll also keep an eye on the JSON response-format issue. Once there= is draft text or a small set of examples, I=E2=80=99d be happy to review it fr= om a testability perspective. Best, Songbo Bu --0000000000007e50930652b4dfe0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"ltr"><p>Hi Andrew,</p> <p>Sorry, my last reply went out in Chinese. What I meant to say was:</p> <p>Thanks, that looks good to me. Treating this as guidance rather than a h= ard interoperability requirement seems like the right balance, especially f= or static deployments.</p> <p>I=E2=80=99ll also keep an eye on the JSON response-format issue. Once th= ere is draft text or a small set of examples, I=E2=80=99d be happy to revie= w it from a testability perspective.</p> <p>Best,<br> Songbo Bu</p> </div> --0000000000007e50930652b4dfe0-- --===============7678550613293427485== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18Kb3BlbnBncCBt YWlsaW5nIGxpc3QgLS0gb3BlbnBncEBpZXRmLm9yZwpUbyB1bnN1YnNjcmliZSBzZW5kIGFuIGVt YWlsIHRvIG9wZW5wZ3AtbGVhdmVAaWV0Zi5vcmcK --===============7678550613293427485==--