[openpgp] Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9580 (884 7)

Daniel Kahn Gillmor <[email protected]> Mon, 13 Jul 2026 17:14:47 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.openpgp
Message-ID <[email protected]>
--===============2810401958446555358==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain

On Wed 2026-03-18 12:27:08 -0700, RFC Errata System wrote:
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC9580,
> "OpenPGP".
>
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid8847
>
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Daniel Huigens <[email protected]>
>
> Section: 9.1
>
> Original Text
> -------------
> 32 octets, size octet, encoded key [Section 5.1.6]
>
> 56 octets, size octet, encoded key [Section 5.1.7]
>
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> 32 octets, size octet, [sym. algo ID if v3 PKESK,]
> encoded key [Section 5.1.6]
>
> 56 octets, size octet, [sym. algo ID if v3 PKESK,]
> encoded key [Section 5.1.7]

I think this erratum is correct.  And as Daniel says, the table should
also be updated in the IANA registry.

   --dkg

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

wr0EARYKAG8FgmpVVUcJEHgLhU7ZwrSWRxQAAAAAAB4AIHNhbHRAbm90YXRpb25z
LnNlcXVvaWEtcGdwLm9yZ9k3EgTET9T/JaRJ61uOjuvitnk3F/bwQ+EYZ5bpN3I8
FiEEY6wRjlsuXWbIioWneAuFTtnCtJYAAKbIAP4+AJNQlYiUhGUXboZEzfgsO8dz
m/NC6t1zoWAIslLwtQD9FtYgJbcsktq/hJle9ZTHwfIBH4V2SMZGLntcYvec2AI=
=COfo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--


--===============2810401958446555358==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: inline

X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18Kb3BlbnBncCBt
YWlsaW5nIGxpc3QgLS0gb3BlbnBncEBpZXRmLm9yZwpUbyB1bnN1YnNjcmliZSBzZW5kIGFuIGVt
YWlsIHRvIG9wZW5wZ3AtbGVhdmVAaWV0Zi5vcmcK

--===============2810401958446555358==--