[openpgp] Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9580 (909 4)

On Mon 2026-08-10 16:36:40 +0000, [email protected] wrote:
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC9580,
> "OpenPGP"
>
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://errata.rfc-editor.org/eid9094/

[...]
> Notes
> -----
> RFC 8017 describes PKCS#1 v2.2, not PKCS#1 v2.1


This appears to be correct, and i think we should approve this erratum.

https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8017/#page-77  says that this is the
only change from 2.1 to 2.2:

~~~
   Version 2.2:

      Version 2.2 updates the list of allowed hashing algorithms to
      align them with FIPS 180-4 [SHS], therefore adding SHA-224,
      SHA-512/224, and SHA-512/256.  The following substantive changes
      were made:

      *  Object identifiers for sha224WithRSAEncryption,
         sha512-224WithRSAEncryption, and sha512-256WithRSAEncryption
         were added.

      *  This version continues to support the schemes in version 2.1.
~~~

Does anyone else have a different understanding?

Regards,

        --dkg

_______________________________________________
openpgp mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

wr0EARYKAG8Fgmp7ksEJEHgLhU7ZwrSWRxQAAAAAAB4AIHNhbHRAbm90YXRpb25z
LnNlcXVvaWEtcGdwLm9yZ43UuEkvH+P1R5xmII0EkIPjhPAIA9LaeSEmWOVnLrZN
FiEEY6wRjlsuXWbIioWneAuFTtnCtJYAANfuAQCWio1VL7cIWV7LsG8O+FntHrQO
nHhhykvMsn2aSqeG+QD/UDagZPGo1Bv9RZY+efJmzRG+NfX3E+WX56+0Ezhm3wc=
=wDZk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----