Re: Revised ID Needed for draft-ietf-opes-iab-04?

Alex,

it's on my to-do list, and I apologize for the delay in getting this 
started - too many things happened recently...

I'll try to send out a note to the list, which is overdue. But in 
general, yes, it's time to re-work the drafts based on IESG feedback. 
I also don't have much more than what's available in the ID tracker, 
though.

Thanks,
   Markus

Alex Rousskov wrote:
> 
> According to IESG ID tracker, a revised version is needed for
> draft-ietf-opes-iab-04. I do not think I have received any information
> regarding this decision from the IESG. Could somebody (Chairs?) please
> let me know:
> 
> 	(a) is this the time to start revising the ID?
> 	(b) is there a list of problems that must be fixed?
> 	(c) once revised, does the ID go directly to IESG or
> 	    do we start the process from scratch?
> 
> As for (b), the ID Tracker gives access to "IN IESG DISCUSSION" items.
> However, some of the IESG people raising questions in those items
> later change their position from Discuss to No Objection. Can their
> questions be ignored if, for example, it is not clear what they want
> or addressing their (now removed?) objections may open new objections?
> Will there be a concise/precise list of objections that must be
> addressed? Or should we do our best to guess what needs to be changed
> and resubmit?
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> Alex.
>