Work on Rules Language

Markus Hofmann <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.opes
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Folks,

the deadline for our rules language document was October last year. 
This deadline has already been extended a few times. So we need to 
decide on how to move on with this document.

Based on earlier discussions on the mailing list about status and work 
needed, we checked with Ted (our AD) and discussed the following options:

  (1) Produce a minimal draft on "P" now, knowing that it will not
      be sufficient and be obsolete if the group gets re-chartered
      and if it continues to work on "P".
      Pros: We would meet the charter item
      Cons: Wastes time (assuming "P" will be in possible re-charter)

  (2) Extend the current deadline for another 2-4 months.

  (3) Remove this specific work item from our current charter and
      put it up for consideration in a possible re-charter.

After discussions with Ted, we believe that choice (3) is the most 
sensible, as it allows us to actually to do the work we believe needs 
doing, and all this in a realistic time frame. We also won't waste any 
time completing a document that won't meet our needs.

As such, we'll send a request to our AD and to the secretariat to 
remove the OPES rules language from our current charter and include it 
in discussions for a re-charter.

Any strong objections?

Thanks,
   Markus
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.