Re: Revised ID Needed for draft-ietf-opes-iab-04?

Alex,

> 	I will start working on these issues and will post suggested
> changes.

Excellent, thanks!!

 > I hope I can fix all of them except I am not quite sure about
> the "inadequate security considerations section" comment. I can
> address the latter by providing a list of Security Sections in the
> other drafts, but doing so seems silly/redundant.

My feeling is that this might be sufficient, since I believe the 
security considerations are already address elsewhere, we just need to 
point it out. If we can address the comment and thereby pass IESG 
review, we should do so.

> 	The example you suggest may not be appropriate because
> pro-actively notifying 3rd parties of viruses and such is becoming less
> and less popular idea (there were some IETF drafts about that IIRC).

You're right, I remember previous comments along those lines. Any 
other suggestions, anyone?

-Markus