Re: Revised ID Needed for draft-ietf-opes-iab-04?

Markus Hofmann <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.opes
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Alex,

both examples look good to me. Minor comment inline.

>    The above concerns call for making notification optional. The OPES
>    architecture allows for an efficient and meaningful notification
>    protocol to be implemented in certain OPES environments.  For
>    example, an OPES callout server attached to a gateway or firewall may
>    scan outgoing traffic for signs of worm or virus activity and notify
>    a local Intrusion Detection System (IDS) of potentially compromised
>    hosts inside the network. Such notifications may use OPES tracing
>    information to pinpoint the infected host (which could be another
>    OPES entity). 

Although I believe to understand the intent of using the term "host" 
here, I'm wondering wether it might be easier to understand if we talk 
about a "server" in this example. I had to read the example twice to 
understand that the "host" you're talking about is a content source 
rather than the content consumer. But it might just be me :)



>    Another environment where efficient and meaningful notification using
>    OPES tracing is possible are Content Delivery Networks (CDNs).  A CDN
>    node may use multiple content adaptation services to customize
>    generic content supplied by the content producer (a web site). For
>    example, the node may insert advertisements for client-local events
>    or services.  The node itself may not understand specifics of the ad
>    insertion algorithm implemented in OPES callout servers.  However, it
>    may use OPES trace to notify content producer about the number of
>    certain advertisements inserted (i.e., the number of "impressions"
>    delivered to the customer) or even the number of ad "clicks" the
>    customer made (e.g., if the node hosts content linked from the ads).
>    Note that OPES services may not have enough information to contact
>    the content producer directly in this case.

The last sentecne could be explained a little more (e.g. what 
information might be missing etc.).

Thanks,
   Markus
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.