Re: Do we know the RFC number for the arch document?

Alex Rousskov wrote:


>>I'd assume you can simply put in a placeholder, which will then be
>>corrected once the RFC number is out.
> 
> 
> Shouldn't we continue to use ID names to increase the chances of RFC
> Editor replacing them with _correct_ RFC numbers?

I've seen either way in the past. But as Marshal also recommended to 
stick with the ID, let's do that.

Thanks,
   Markus