Re: FW: New authorization draft: draft-ietf-opes-authorization-03

Andre Beck <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.opes
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Abbie,

Looks good. Some nitpicks, mostly wrt to the uppercase keywords:

Section 3.3: "Implementation MUST not prohibit..."

"not" should be uppercase

Section 4.1: "The rule author, MAY not know specific service..."

delete comma; MAY should be lowercase

Section 4.1.3: "...modifications to the request MAY need..."

MAY should be lowercase

Section 4.2.3: "Some OPES services MAY need to be invoked..."

MAY should be lowercase

Section 4.3: "...with the architecture [ref ARCH] and this document."

should be a reference to [1]

Section 5.1.2: "...authorization databases MAY be easier..."

MAY should be lowercase

Section 5.1.3: "Authentication MAY be necessary..."

MAY should be lowercase

Section 5.5: "Tthe ability to prevent Traffic..."

should be "The"

-Andre

Abbie Barbir wrote:
>  
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Barbir, Abbie [CAR:1A11:EXCH] 
> Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 11:24 AM
> To: Markus Hofmann; OPES Group
> Cc: 'Marshall Rose'
> Subject: New authorization draft: draft-ietf-opes-authorization-03
> 
> 
> All,
>  
> Attached is the -03 of the authorization draft.
>  
> I have added a terminology and security sections  + fixed MUST etc.. .
>  
> Please review so we can re-submit to the IETF.
>  
> Abbie
>  
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.