Re: An opes services usage question

Alex Rousskov <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.opes
Message-ID <[email protected]>

I agree with Hilarie that we should be careful about potential
overlaps with MIDCOM WG charter. I would suggest that we still start
with a concise but clear-enough proposal that, among other things,
defines "flow participant discovery" problem and lists possible
solution directions. Having such a document at hand, we can do a more
meaningful evaluation of MIDCOM conflicts.

Alex.

On Mon, 12 Apr 2004, The Purple Streak, Hilarie Orman wrote:

>
> If you want to have opes rechartered to include flow participant
> discovery you may need to explain why it should be part of opes
> and not part of midcom.  The answer "because I want it work with
> opes and don't care about anything else" might not be enough to
> convince the authorities.
>
> Hilarie
>
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.