Re: An opes services usage question
Alex Rousskov <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.opes |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I agree with Hilarie that we should be careful about potential overlaps with MIDCOM WG charter. I would suggest that we still start with a concise but clear-enough proposal that, among other things, defines "flow participant discovery" problem and lists possible solution directions. Having such a document at hand, we can do a more meaningful evaluation of MIDCOM conflicts. Alex. On Mon, 12 Apr 2004, The Purple Streak, Hilarie Orman wrote: > > If you want to have opes rechartered to include flow participant > discovery you may need to explain why it should be part of opes > and not part of midcom. The answer "because I want it work with > opes and don't care about anything else" might not be enough to > convince the authorities. > > Hilarie > >