Re: OPES Re-Charter

I would like to contribute to the Rules Language work.

regards
Geetha

Martin Stecher wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I would like to actively participate in the OCP/SMTP and OCP Security topics.
>
> Regards
> Martin
>
> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: [email protected]
> > [mailto:[email protected]]Im Auftrag von Alex Rousskov
> > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 9. Juni 2004 18:28
> > An: Markus Hofmann
> > Cc: OPES Group
> > Betreff: Re: OPES Re-Charter
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 9 Jun 2004, Markus Hofmann wrote:
> >
> > > From previous discussions, the following candidate topics for
> > > re-chartering have been discussed:
> > >
> > > (1) Rules Language
> > > (2) OCP profile for SMTP
> > > (3) Support for streaming media
> > > (4) Others?
> > >
> > > Please indicate which topics are of interest to you, and whether you
> > > can commit to work on the respective item(s). We can move
> > forward only
> > > if folks are able to spend the time required for making progress.
> >
> > I hope to be able to actively work on P Core and OCP/SMTP profile,
> > provided there are other people willing to help or lead.
> >
> > Also, we should discuss whether the charter should include an "OCP
> > Security" draft that details negotiated features like transport-level
> > security and agent authentication. Is anybody interested in securing
> > OCP communications. Does anybody want to take a lead on that?
> >
> > As you know, there have been P and OCP interest a few months ago, when
> > the question first came up. I hope folks are still interested, despite
> > the recent WG "blackout" (one of those IETF process things we have to
> > live with, I guess).
> >
> > If there is NOT enough interest to keep the WG alive, the OCP/SMTP
> > profile can probably be written as an individual draft. I am less sure
> > about P work. It seems there are some fundamental rule language
> > scoping issues that are better resolved in a WG setting.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Alex.
> >
> > P.S. Thank you, Marshall, for putting up with this working group!
> >
> >