Re: OPES Re-Charter

Markus Hofmann <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.opes
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Alex Rousskov wrote:

> I do not have a problem with the above, but I would suggest that those
> interested working on the security draft, still do it as a individual
> draft and submit it for WG consideration when it is almost ready. We
> can have the corresponding "consider adoption of security draft, if
> any" item on the charter, without committing any WG work at this
> point. The charter can be easily expanded later if the draft is
> adopted. Would that work for others?

If we don't commit working on it, I'd prefer to keep it off the charter.

No problem if individuals make progress on the security front, as long 
as it doesn't distract/take resources from work on the charter items. 
When the draft is mature, the WG can certainly consider adopting the work.

-Markus
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.