Re: OPES Re-Charter

At 09:15 11/06/04, Geetha Manjunath wrote:
> > For the rules language, I'd like to have some more discussion on the
> > scope. Previous discussions drifted a little bit into the space of a
> > "programming language" for intermediary services. Originally, the
> > rules language was meant to simply indicate to an OPES processor which
> > services to invoke on a given message. Also, I'd assume that we'd
> > build on the previous work that was done on "P". Any thoughts?
>
>We could start from 'P' - may need some enhancements though . But I think  we
>need to separate the 'runtime specification' and 'language specification' in
>some form.

Could you please help. What is "P". Were is it documented?
jfc