Re: P work in new charter
Markus Hofmann <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.opes |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Geetha Manjunath wrote: > I beleive and agree with others on the need for local services for peformance > reasons. If the mechanism is an indirect way of registering local services that is > fine - but then we should clearly specify means of interfacing external modules to > P. [ does that add to the scope of P? ] All you need is calling a local service from within "P" - just as you would call a remotes service, it's just running on the local machine. Alex elaborated in this in his previous email. > Can you please give me specific pointers to existing mechanisms here? I would like > to evaluate their sufficiency for the intended usage. For example, use a CLI to load a rules file locally on the machine, use FTP to transfer a rules file, you might use HTTP.... -Markus