Re: P work in new charter

Markus Hofmann <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.opes
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Geetha Manjunath wrote:

> I beleive and agree with others on the need for  local services for peformance
> reasons. If the mechanism is an indirect way of registering local services that is
> fine - but then we should clearly specify means of interfacing external modules to
> P. [ does that add to the scope of P? ]

All you need is calling a local service from within "P" - just as you 
would call a remotes service, it's just running on the local machine. 
Alex elaborated in this in his previous email.

> Can you please give me specific pointers to existing mechanisms here? I would like
> to evaluate their sufficiency  for the intended usage.

For example, use a CLI to load a rules file locally on the machine, 
use FTP to transfer a rules file, you might use HTTP....

-Markus
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.