Re: Strawman OPES Charter

On Tue, 13 Jul 2004, Markus Hofmann wrote:

> Alex Rousskov wrote:
>
> > 	- Assist with OCP/HTTP implementation and monitor
> > 	  OCP/HTTP deployment experience. Maintain interoperability
> > 	  and compliance data on OCP/HTTP implementations.
> > 	  (This item may have an "implementation and deployment
> > 	  report" as a deliverable, but it does not have to, I guess)
>
> No, not for this re-charter. But an interesting issue.

May I ask why not? Isn't it a "good practice" to shepherd produced
standards? If the item has no deliverable, would it really increase WG
load? We do not intend to ignore any OCP/HTTP questions/concerns
coming at us from early adopters, are we?

Thank you,

Alex.