Re: Strawman OPES Charter
Markus Hofmann <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.opes |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Abbie Barbir wrote: >>Just to make sure: which of the following you consider essential: >> >> a) forget about P choice, start from scratch, write a >> formal "language requirements" document, then select among >> IRML, P, and possibly other candidates. >> >> b) confirm past P choice, but write a "language requirements" >> document or section, before proceeding with polishing P >> >> c) confirm P choice, and do not write a "language >> requirements" document/section > > > well, I go for option a) to be frank. However, I can live with b) or c) > if the WG wants that. Are there any new insights or developments that came up after our earlier discussions we had on "P" and other approaches? If not, I don't want to re-iterate the discussions we already had. -Markus