Re: Strawman OPES Charter

Markus Hofmann <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.opes
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Abbie Barbir wrote:

>>Just to make sure: which of the following you consider essential: 
>>
>>      a) forget about P choice, start from scratch, write a 
>>         formal "language requirements" document, then select among 
>>         IRML, P, and possibly other candidates. 
>>
>>      b) confirm past P choice, but write a "language requirements" 
>>         document or section, before proceeding with polishing P 
>>
>>      c) confirm P choice, and do not write a "language 
>>         requirements" document/section 
> 
> 
> well, I go for option a) to be frank. However, I can live with b) or c)
> if the WG wants that. 

Are there any new insights or developments that came up after our 
earlier discussions we had on "P" and other approaches? If not, I 
don't want to re-iterate the discussions we already had.

-Markus
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.