Re: SMTP adaptation conflicts with other WGs

I chatted with Eric Burger (Co-Chair of lemonde) a while back on this 
topic, and the feeling was that there's no overlap or no major one. 
Looks like lemonade is focused mainly on IMAP.

[I've copied Eric on this email. Eric - do you hav any thoughts?]

The fax working group was mentioned several times, so we'll also have 
to have a look there.

I would suggest we polish our proposed re-charter, and then work with 
Ted and the Chairs of the respective group to make sure that there's 
no overlap.

-Markus

Alex Rousskov wrote:

> Has anybody looked at potential SMTP-work overlap with LEMONADE WG?
> They seem to focus on IMAP, but their problem is what OPES solutions
> are supposed to solve:
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/lemonade-charter.html
> Lemonade is tasked to provide a set of enhancements and profiles of
> Internet email submission, transport, and retrieval protocols to
> facilitate operation on platforms with constrained resources, or
> communications links with high latency or limited bandwidth.
> 
> 
> Are there any other WG with similar work items? LEMONADE charter
> mentions: VPIM, FAX, and IMAPEXT IETF working groups.
> 
> Should we make sure we are not stepping on other WG toes? How? Or will
> our AD insure that, once we have a polished charter?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alex.