Re: P-services interface in Strawman OPES Charter

Alex Rousskov <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.opes
Message-ID <[email protected]>

On Wed, 14 Jul 2004, Geetha Manjunath wrote:

> How about supporting non-std interfaces as additional module?
>
> For example (pl forget the syntax for now):
> Services.invoke(serviceA,1,2);
> // Invokes the std OCP service, serviceA  - OCP service supported by default.
>
> import  ICAPService // A special module that supports invoke method on ICAP
> services
> ICAPService.invoke(serviceB);

Sure, that's the intended feature/beauty of P design! If we get the
abstraction level high enough, 3rd parties would be able to add all
sorts of modules doing all sorts of interesting things, while P
programmers will not even notice.

Do we agree that defining such additional modules or even defining an
interface to plug such additional modules into a P interpreter is
outside of our current scope?

Thanks,

Alex.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.