RE: P-services interface in Strawman OPES Charter

Alex,
yes, can not just assume that things are implied or give the impression that
we will do that.
To be very frank, there will be a huge debate about WSDL and how, when or if
it will be used. This is the nature of the beast with service description.

Abbie


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alex Rousskov [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2004 2:52 AM
> To: Markus Hofmann
> Cc: OPES Group
> Subject: Re: P-services interface in Strawman OPES Charter
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, 14 Jul 2004, Markus Hofmann wrote:
> 
> > What about the following:
> >
> >    In addition, the WG will define a rules language to control
> >    selection and invocation of services by an OPES processor. This
> >    includes a mechanism allowing an OPES processor to 
> perform a runtime
> >    check of service parameters, leveraging existing interface
> >    description standards like WSDL, if possible, or OPES-specific
> >    description otherwise.
> 
> Sounds good to me. I assume there will be a sentence 
> somewhere about documenting interfaces for P/HTTP and P/SMTP 
> modules. Or is that implied?
> 
> Injecting "investigate" before "a mechanism allowing" may 
> make Abbie happier. Or we can replace "includes" with "may 
> include". Is that what you are after, Abbie?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alex.
> 
>