Re: Nibutes from San Diego
Alex Rousskov <[email protected]> Mon, 30 Aug 2004 09:04:59 -0600 (MDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.opes |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Understood, thanks! If RE are introduced, they will be usable as boolean expressions (at least) in if-statement guards. Alex. On Sun, 29 Aug 2004, The Purple Streak, Hilarie Orman wrote: > > If a rule has the form > > IF P THEN DO A > (sometimes written P -> A as operational semantics) > > then I'll call P the lefthand side or precondition or predicate. > > Some examples are > > if (http:response:header:set-cookie ~= "RMID=\([^;]*]" ) then > munge_cookie ( $1 ) > > if (http:content-type ~= "^text") and > ( set_of (http:body:img:src ) ~= "[/]images/global[/]") then > rewrite_images () > > etc. > > Hilarie > > >> On Tue, 17 Aug 2004, Markus Hofmann wrote: > >> > Hilarie Orman expressed a preference for having P support regular >> > expressions in the lefthand side of rules, > >> Hilarie, > >> Can you give an example or two of a regular expression in the >> lefthand side of rules? What is "lefthand side of rules"? Just trying >> to understand what the requirement is here... > >> Thanks, > >> Alex. > >