Re: Another Update

Folks,

if there is no interest to continue the work with a new charter, we 
should withdraw our new charter proposal and close the WG.

If there's an interest to continue, we need a discussion on this list 
to get the work going. AND - we need folks willing to put in the time 
and effort to drive the work forward.

Thanks,
-Markus

Markus Hofmann wrote:
> 
> Folks,
> 
> we heard from Ted that our new charter proposal was discussed by the 
> IESG and no major concerns were raised. It went out for public review 
> and will get a second IESG review at the next telechat. Based on this, 
> let's get a discussion of the new (proposed) work items going on the 
> mailing list.
> 
> Tony suggested to have an ananalysis of "P" vs. "Sieve". Anyone any 
> thoughts or willing to take a first crack? Why do we need to invent a 
> new language when there's already a language that does very similar 
> things we want to do for email? Very valid question! [This hopefully 
> gets some folks rolling :]
> 
> We also need to get a discussion going on SMTP Use Cases - so please 
> post to the list of you've some thoughts on that!
> 
> Folks - it was quiet for a while. Now that we move forward with the new 
> work items, let's get the discussions going again. Only with active 
> participants it's worthwhile for us to continue!
> 
> -Markus
>