Re: SMTP Use Cases

jfcm <[email protected]> Fri, 22 Oct 2004 16:17:28 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.opes
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Martin,
I do not see any of these examples (which are much needed) being an OPES. 
They are middlebox (RFC 3234) services. None of them are on the fly 
protocol add-on functions in a store and foreward system.
jfc


At 12:19 22/10/2004, Martin Stecher wrote:


>Hi,
>
>mid of July there has been a short discussion whether we want
>to add a Use Cases section to the SMTP adaptation draft or
>create an extra document about SMTP use cases.
>
>Maybe we first collect the use cases we feel important to
>write about and then also consider the volume of that before
>deciding where to put it.
>
>Here are my first thoughts on SMTP use cases.
>Please add and comment.
>
>There are use cases for SMTP message content (1) and SMTP dialog
>adaptation (2). And there are use cases where the message content
>may have an influence on mail forwarding options or trigger
>other side effects (3).
>
>1. Examples for message content adaptation:
>
>- Virus checking
>- Other security policies (e.g. forbidden attachment types)
>- Content Analyzes (classify content into categories, search for forbidden 
>content)
>- Translation of message text
>- Filter Spam (pure content adaption may just mark the message, for other 
>actions see below)
>- Transform content to make it better readable on special mail clients 
>(e.g. Blackberries)
>- Encrypt emails or verify signature.
>
>
>2. Short form of the examples for SMTP dialog adaptation I gave in my emai
>on July 14, plus a new one:
>
>- Validate "MAIL FROM"
>- Validate "RCPT TO"
>- Sender validation via IP, HELO, SenderID, etc.
>- Resolve distribution lists
>
>
>3. Examples for mail forwarding options or other side effects:
>
>- Delay a message of a certain size or content
>- Send virus notifications to others when virus has been detected
>- Move email to a special queue (e.g. Spam queue)
>- Drop a (spam) message
>- Out of office replies
>
>
>Regards
>Martin