Response modification

OPES is supposed to enable new services.

The call-forward wouldn't have been a hack if it had been done as
part of an OPES service, using the same architectural model that
we used for HTTP.  Further, we rule out a large number of useful
identity-based services by eliminating the ability to do
response modification.  

Hilarie

On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 at 18:40:27 +0000 Tony Finch announced:

> it doesn't really fit into the OPES model because the
> call-forward is not a full SMTP conversation (it's a hack), so it's
> probably too much of a strain to support something that's fairly esoteric.