RE: Activation points and callout modes

Tony Finch <[email protected]> Wed, 2 Feb 2005 17:56:42 +0000
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.opes
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005, The Purple Streak, Hilarie Orman wrote:
>
> For the SMTP queues, it had seemed an interesting possibility to have
> the callout server maintain the queues.  That's a radical change to
> the normal SMTP implementation, admittedly, and it might not make
> sense from the perspective of I/O efficiency.  But it would facilitate
> a very lean SMTP implementation.

Existing callout protocols try to avoid any queueing in the policy server.

Postfix has support for a pre-reception SMTP proxy, effectively mode 1 but
implemented like mode 4.
http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_PROXY_README.html

It also has a simpler policy protocol, which is more like an OPES mode 1
callout protocol.
http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_POLICY_README.html

The Sendmail milter protocol is another mode 1 example, but it's defined
by its implementation rather than in an open fashion.
http://www.milter.org/milter_api/

Tony.
-- 
f.a.n.finch  <[email protected]>  http://dotat.at/
CULLERCOATS: THE STRONG SOUTHWEST WINDS WILL AFFECT SOUTHERN AREAS ON
SATURDAY, WHILE THE WINDS EASE FOR A TIME IN THE NORTH.