RE: Activation points and callout modes

> 
> At 17:33 02/02/2005, Martin Stecher wrote:
> > > I don't see how D (email body modification) "falls back" 
> to A (command
> > > modification), but as long as it can be done, I don't 
> care what letter
> > > gets assigned to it.
> >
> >On Jan 20 you replied to an earlier message saying:
> >   > Yes, I think that operating on the DATA portion fits into the
> >   > architecture without the need for special consideration.
> >
> >That is what I wanted to describe here again. The email 
> message body is
> >the data coming after the DATA command. It can be seen also 
> as command
> >modification. No special consideration necessary -> D "falls 
> back" to A.
> 
> This is true with unstructured text. But not with structured 
> text messages 
> (XML, ASN.1, proprietary formats, signals, etc.).
> 

I don't understand what the content type of the message body has
to do with this. Please explain.