Re: Next Step on Uses Cases Draft

It's less about "having" the list, it's more about getting the list in 
written words and int othe draft.

-Markus

jfcm wrote:
> 
> At 06:34 23/03/2005, Markus Hofmann wrote:
> 
>> Folks,
>> coming out of the IETF Meeting in Minneapolis, we need to revamp our 
>> SMTP Use Cases Draft.
>>
>> The current draft attempts to categorize use cases and to come up with 
>> sort of a classification. Instead of doing this, general feedback was 
>> that the draft should explain/list very concret uses cases. This will 
>> help to set the scope.
>>
>> Maybe a structure similar to the one we had in the outdated/expired 
>> document http://papers.mhof.com/draft-beck-opes-esfnep-01.txt might be 
>> helpful (forget about the "business model" parts, but the listing of 
>> use case descriptions seems helpful). MArtin's list at 
>> http://www.martin-stecher.de/opes/smtpusecases.html looks like a good 
>> starting point - the uses cases just would have to be detailed.
>>
>> Any opinions? We need to get this wrapped up very soon.
> 
> 
> We collectively did that 3 months ago. Just take all the cases we 
> documented in "SMTP Uses case" thread and my "applications addition". 
> And say were/how we will carry all of them.
> 
> I am not sure I have all the mails stored, so I cannot do it. We can 
> also have a rerun. Whan we have all the list, we could send it on the 
> general list calling for additional suggestions. This would might give 
> some new ideas. We would get notice, probably interest and support.
> jfc