Re: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-opes-smtp-use-cases-02.txt

On 7/7/05, Dave Crocker <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >  draft-crocker-email-arch is a great document.
> > >  As an individual draft that has not yet been published as RFC how
> > >  much sense does it make to refer and wait for that?
> > >
> >  Dave -- do you have any idea when draft-crocker-email-arch might be
> >  seeing a last call?
> 
> thanks for the prod.  i need to do another revision.
> 
> (for each revision, i think it will be the last, but someone winds up pointing
> out a basic deficiency that needs fixing and turns out to take serious thought.
> I think the document gets better each time, but the effort is some orders of
> magnitude higher than I had envisioned.)

Thanks, This is one of the reasons that I think the OPES use case
draft should try to reference it rather than rewrite even a portion of
it briefly, since its surprisingly complicated :)

> but, IMO, close *on the other side* of it.

Indeed.

-Rob

-- 
Rob Siemborski        |     PGP:0x5CE32FCC    |     [email protected]
Software Engineer     |                       |            650-623-6925