Re: Moving Forward

Folks,

from the silence on the list and the lack of any response, I would 
conclude that there is *no* interest in moving forward with actually 
defining a OCP/SMTP profile.

If this conclusion is wrong and there is interest in moving forward, 
please indicate your willingness to lead the protocol work and 
co-author a draft *now*.

If there are no volunteers, I'll ask that the milestone and 
deliverable get removed from our charter. Given that we also don't 
make any progress on the rules language, I would then ask the AD/IESG 
to close the WG.

Thanks,
   Markus


Markus Hofmann wrote:
> 
> Folks,
> 
> with the "SMTP Use Cases" draft bing submitted to IESG for consideration 
> as informal RFC, it's now time to move ahead to our next milestone, 
> which is
> 
>  "Initial document on OCP/SMTP profile for MTAs, including mechanisms
>  for tracing and bypass".
> 
> Does anyone believe the use cases draft is appealing enough so that it's 
> worthwhile to spend time and effort on developing a protocol that will 
> enable these use cases?
> 
> Who is volunteering to lead the protocol work and co-author a draft?
> 
> Thanks,
>   Markus