Re: Possible new Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture (RAI) Area

JFC (Jefsey) Morfin wrote:
> 
> FYI. On IETF main.
> 
> At 23:05 19/09/2005, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
>> I guess I would go for "Low Latency Applications and Infrastucture " 
>> (LLAI) myself.
> 
> Do you conceptually accept in that wording that an OPES can be plugged 
> in there, for example as part of a service to the exchange? The WG-OPES 
> has worked on HTTP, and now on SMTP. IMHO OPES also fit 
> pseudo-synchronous exchanges. In that case the WG-OPES should be able to 
> dialog with the new area at a later stage.
> jfc

Conceptually, the OPES framework could also be applied to "real-time 
applications" - at an earlier stage, we discussed applicability to RTP, 
for example.

-Markus