Re: Callout Protocol Core - Kept parameter

Hi!

Thank you for your answer.

Martin Stecher schrieb:
> [..]
> I am confused too and wonder why I didn't see that before.
> Probably the idea was that the value of a named parameter can be a
> space separated list of values and therefore the CRLF separation of
> the named parameters has been introduced.
> That means:
>
>   named-value = name ":" SP value *(SP value)
>   
 From my point of view this would be the best solution to resolve this 
conflict.
The rule for named values could then be rewritten to:

named-value = name ":" SP anonym-parameters

> [...]
>   
>> So, what's the correct representation of the Kept parameter value?
>>
>> As list?
>> |> Kept: (65,64)
>>     
> Would work by syntax but I think the idea of a list is that the number
> of elements is not preset.
>   
I've used this example, because there is the following sentence in rfc4037:

|> For simplicity, preserved data is always a contiguous chunk of
|> original data, described by an (offset, size) pair using a "Kept"
|> parameter of a Data Use Mine (DUM) message.

In this sentence the Kept parameter parts where written as list. But 
maybe it's only a strange coincidence.
>> Quoted?
>> |> Kept: "65 64"
>>     
> No! Quoted syntax is size colon value and not appropriate here.
>   
Yes, you are right. The above example is syntactically invalid and 
should be written as "5:65 64". Anyway. It makes no sense to do this.

Regards,
Martin