RE: Routing requirements draft

 
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eliot Lear [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 7:09 AM
> To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
> Cc: Ops-Nm (E-mail); [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Routing requirements draft
> 
> Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote:
> > This is the question that we are discussing. I personally 
> do not know 
> > the answer to it.
> >
> > But I know that the alternative today - mandating the 
> writing of MIB 
> > modules - does not work well in many cases.
> >
> > Dan
> 
> 
> I agree with what you wrote, and I even believe one should 
> consider manageability prior to thinking about bits on a 
> wire.  My only point is that if we are heavy handed about 
> this, particularly in the routing area, the results will be perverse.
> 
> Eliot

Of course. There is no intention to set the elephants fee in the
porcelain store :-)

Actually what is going on in the routing area is an initiative of the
routing area, initiated by them, without any involvement by OPS. We
shall hear today more about how it worked. 

Dan
 
>