Re: [MIB-DOCTORS] FW: I-D ACTION:draft-farrel-pce-manageability-requirements-00.txt
"Adrian Farrel" <[email protected]> Tue, 17 Oct 2006 16:39:56 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ops,gmane.ietf.ops-nm |
|---|---|
| Organization | Old Dog Consulting |
| Message-ID | <060501c6f203$1700f440$540110ac@your029b8cecfe> |
Hi Bert, Very man thanks for reading and commenting. > 3.2 Information and Data Models > > You might want to add a ptr (citation/reference) to RFC3544: Yes, this is useful. > - Section 4: > > 4. Manageability Considerations > > This document defines the Manageability Considerations sections for > inclusion in all Routing Area Internet-Drafts. As such, the whole > document is relevant to manageability. > > while teh title and intro/abstract seem to limit it to PCE WG documents? > I personally prefer to see this tested in a larger context than just > a single WG. Ooops. Typo. The I-D started as a Routing Area I-D, but I could not get sufficient traction. Therefore the intention is to limit the scope to the PCE working group (where I'm a co-chair) and where the WG has indicated that they are willing to work in this mode. In essence, this serves as a process experiment without the so-called overhead of the formal process overhead. If (when :-) this is shown to be successful it can be held up as beacon to all other WGs and Areas. Cheers, Adrian _______________________________________________ OPS-AREA mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ops-area