Re: [MIB-DOCTORS] FW: I-D ACTION:draft-farrel-pce-manageability-requirements-00.txt

"Adrian Farrel" <[email protected]> Tue, 17 Oct 2006 16:39:56 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.ops,gmane.ietf.ops-nm
Organization Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID <060501c6f203$1700f440$540110ac@your029b8cecfe>
Hi Bert,

Very man thanks for reading and commenting.

>   3.2 Information and Data Models
>
>  You might want to add a ptr (citation/reference) to RFC3544:

Yes, this is useful.

> - Section 4:
>
>   4. Manageability Considerations
>
>   This document defines the Manageability Considerations sections for
>   inclusion in all Routing Area Internet-Drafts. As such, the whole
>   document is relevant to manageability.
>
>  while teh title and intro/abstract seem to limit it to PCE WG documents?
>  I personally prefer to see this tested in a larger context than just
>  a single WG.

Ooops. Typo.

The I-D started as a Routing Area I-D, but I could not get sufficient 
traction.
Therefore the intention is to limit the scope to the PCE working group 
(where I'm a co-chair) and where the WG has indicated that they are willing 
to work in this mode.

In essence, this serves as a process experiment without the so-called 
overhead of the formal process overhead. If (when :-) this is shown to be 
successful it can be held up as beacon to all other WGs and Areas.

Cheers,
Adrian




_______________________________________________
OPS-AREA mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ops-area