Re: RE: [MIB-DOCTORS] RE: SNMP MIBs and IETF standards trackwork

"Randy Presuhn" <[email protected]> Tue, 7 Nov 2006 21:01:42 -0800
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.ops-nm
Message-ID <009b01c702f3$4061acc0$6601a8c0@oemcomputer>
Hi -

> From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <[email protected]>
> To: "David B Harrington" <[email protected]>; "Natale, Bob" <[email protected]>
> Cc: "MIB Doctors" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 11:13 AM
> Subject: [OPS-NM] RE: [MIB-DOCTORS] RE: SNMP MIBs and IETF standards trackwork
...
>  Some WGs consider that SNMP does not fit their requirements,
> especially for configuration operations. Mandating a MIB module and
> support for SNMP is not applicable in some cases and in other prevents a
> real discussion about manageability requirements. 
...

What protocol(s) and management information model(s) are these
WGs using?  Or are they just arguing that since SNMP and MIBs
aren't perfect, it's better to do nothing?

Randy


_______________________________________________
OPS-NM mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ops-nm