FW: Documents on IESG Telechat Agenda for March 8, 2007
"Romascanu, Dan \(Dan\)" <[email protected]> Fri, 2 Mar 2007 10:56:21 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ops-nm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <AAB4B3D3CF0F454F98272CBE187FDE2F0C673B21@is0004avexu1.global.avaya.com> |
Please see below the documents on the agenda for next IESG telechat.
Please note that there are several MIB documents on the agenda this
time. I would appreciate if you can send me your reviews and comments by
Wednesday, March 7, 2007 COB.=20
Thanks and Regards,
Dan
2. Protocol Actions
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the
Internet
infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"
2.1 WG Submissions
2.1.1 New Item
o draft-ietf-ccamp-crankback-06.txt
Crankback Signaling Extensions for MPLS and GMPLS RSVP-TE (Proposed=20
Standard) - 1 of 12=20
Token: Ross Callon
o draft-ietf-hubmib-efm-mib-06.txt
Definitions and Managed Objects for OAM Functions on Ethernet Like=20
Interfaces (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 12=20
Note: Bert Wijnen is the PROTO shepherd=20
Token: Dan Romascanu
o draft-ietf-idr-avoid-transition-04.txt
Avoid BGP Best Path Transitions from One External to Another
(Proposed=20
Standard) - 3 of 12=20
Note: Last Call ends 2007-03-12=20
Token: Bill Fenner
o draft-ietf-pim-sm-bsr-10.txt
Bootstrap Router (BSR) Mechanism for PIM (Proposed Standard) - 4 of
12=20
Note: Last Call ends 2007-03-12=20
Token: Bill Fenner
o draft-ietf-avt-hc-over-mpls-protocol-08.txt
Protocol Extensions for Header Compression over MPLS (Proposed
Standard) -=20
5 of 12=20
Note: PROTO Shepherd is Colin Perkins.=20
Token: Cullen Jennings
o draft-ietf-rohc-tcp-16.txt
RObust Header Compression (ROHC): A Profile for TCP/IP (ROHC-TCP)
(Proposed=20
Standard) - 6 of 12=20
Token: Magnus Westerlund
o draft-ietf-webdav-rfc2518bis-18.txt
HTTP Extensions for Distributed Authoring - WebDAV (Proposed
Standard) - 7=20
of 12=20
Token: Ted Hardie
o draft-ietf-sip-connected-identity-05.txt
Connected Identity in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)
(Proposed=20
Standard) - 8 of 12=20
Note: Keith Drage is the document PROTO shepherd=20
Token: Cullen Jennings
o draft-ietf-imss-fc-zs-mib-03.txt
Fibre-Channel Zone Server MIB (Proposed Standard) - 9 of 12=20
Token: Dan Romascanu
o draft-ietf-imss-fc-rscn-mib-02.txt
Fibre Channel Registered State Change Notification (RSCN) MIB
(Proposed=20
Standard) - 10 of 12=20
Token: Dan Romascanu
o draft-ietf-imss-fc-fcs-mib-02.txt
Fibre-Channel Fabric Configuration Server MIB (Proposed Standard) -
11 of=20
12=20
Token: Dan Romascanu
o draft-ietf-eap-keying-18.txt
Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) Key Management Framework
(Proposed=20
Standard) - 12 of 12=20
Token: Jari Arkko
2.1.2 Returning Item
o draft-ietf-mpls-ecmp-bcp-03.txt
Avoiding Equal Cost Multipath Treatment in MPLS Networks (BCP) - 1
of 1=20
Token: Ross Callon
2.2 Individual Submissions
2.2.1 New Item
o draft-bellovin-useipsec-06.txt
Guidelines for Mandating the Use of IPsec (BCP) - 1 of 5=20
Token: Russ Housley
o draft-siemborski-rfc2554bis-08.txt
SMTP Service Extension for Authentication (Proposed Standard) - 2 of
5=20
Token: Lisa Dusseault
o Five-document ballot: - 3 of 5
- draft-legg-xed-rxer-07.txt
Robust XML Encoding Rules (RXER) for Abstract Syntax Notation One
(ASN.1) (Proposed Standard)=20
- draft-legg-xed-rxer-ei-04.txt
Encoding Instructions for the Robust XML Encoding Rules (RXER)
(Proposed=20
Standard)=20
- draft-legg-xed-asd-07.txt
Abstract Syntax Notation X (ASN.X) (Proposed Standard)=20
- draft-legg-xed-asd-gserei-03.txt
Abstract Syntax Notation X (ASN.X) Representation of Encoding=20
Instructions for the Generic String Encoding Rules (GSER)
(Proposed=20
Standard)=20
- draft-legg-xed-asd-xerei-03.txt
Abstract Syntax Notation X (ASN.X) Representation of Encoding=20
Instructions for the XML Encoding Rules (XER) (Proposed Standard)
Token: Ted Hardie
o draft-mcwalter-langtag-mib-02.txt
Language Tag MIB (Proposed Standard) - 4 of 5=20
Token: Bill Fenner
o draft-mcwalter-uri-mib-03.txt
Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) MIB (Proposed Standard) - 5 of 5=20
Token: Bill Fenner
2.2.2 Returning Item
NONE
3. Document Actions
3.1 WG Submissions
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it
covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"
3.1.1 New Item
o draft-ietf-opes-smtp-security-03.txt
Integrity, privacy and security in OPES for SMTP (Informational) - 1
of 5=20
Token: Ted Hardie
o draft-ietf-pce-pcecp-interarea-reqs-05.txt
PCE Communication Protocol (PCECP) Specific Requirements for
Inter-Area=20
Multi Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) and Generalized MPLS (GMPLS)
Traffic=20
Engineering (Informational) - 2 of 5=20
Token: Ross Callon
o draft-iesg-sponsoring-guidelines-01.txt
Guidance on Area Director Sponsoring of Documents (Informational) -
3 of 5=20
Note: Decided on 2007-01-25 to make this an RFC not an ION, but Last
Call=20
comments have reopened that question.=20
Token: Brian Carpenter
o draft-ietf-dnsop-serverid-08.txt
Requirements for a Mechanism Identifying a Name Server Instance=20
(Informational) - 4 of 5=20
Note: Peter Koch <[email protected]> is the document shepherd=20
Token: David Kessens
o draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt
Reasons to Move NAT-PT to Historic Status (Informational) - 5 of 5=20
Token: David Kessens
3.1.2 Returning Item
NONE
3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it
covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"
3.2.1 New Item
NONE
3.2.2 Returning Item
NONE
3.3 Independent Submissions Via RFC Editor
The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not
found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2) The
IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG
<X>, but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks
that publication is harmful to work in WG <X> and recommends
not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this
document violates the IETF procedures for <X> and should
therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG
approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an
IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should
therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG
approval.
=20
Other matters may be recorded in comments to be passed on
to the RFC Editor as community review of the document.
3.3.1 New Item
o draft-blanchet-v6ops-tunnelbroker-tsp-03.txt
IPv6 Tunnel Broker with the Tunnel Setup Protocol (TSP)
(Experimental) - 1=20
of 1=20
Note: See 'IESG Note' section for proposed RFC 3932 response.=20
Token: David Kessens
3.3.2 Returning Item
NONE
3.3.3 For Action
o draft-ooms-xcast-basic-spec-11.txt
Explicit Multicast (Xcast) Concepts and Options (Experimental) - 1
of 1=20
Token: Brian Carpenter
_______________________________________________
OPS-NM mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ops-nm