Re: [nmrg] Re: Question about draft-xu-cops-push-00.txt

Juergen Schoenwaelder <[email protected]> Thu, 15 Mar 2007 08:24:41 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.ops,gmane.ietf.ops-nm
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 04:02:57PM -0400, Tom-PT Taylor wrote:
 
> My co-authors can better explain the choice of COPS.

So can one of your co-authors please speak up and address Dan's
question in technical terms?

In particular, I like to know what you consider the essential
technical features making COPS-PR more desirable than other protocols
to push configuration information (like NETCONF) that seem to have
gained more community support during the last few years (at least in
the IETF).

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder		 Jacobs University Bremen
<http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/>	 P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 Bremen, Germany

_______________________________________________
OPS-AREA mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ops-area