Re: [OPS-AREA] RE: Comments on XSDMI BoF proposal

Andy Bierman <[email protected]> Wed, 06 Jun 2007 09:05:39 -0700

Newsgroups	gmane.ietf.ops-nm
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

Jon Saperia wrote:
> Thanks for the clarification, lets see what Dave says.  If it is as you 
> say, then I would say what is the justification for introducing 
> duplication of information?

What duplication are you talking about?

BTW, I do not agree with the RFC 4741 definition of config
because it is incomplete.

I use a very NETCONF-centric definition, with 3 states:

   config: Persistent Configuration
           * saved in NV-storage
           * included in <get-config>, <edit-config>, <copy-config>

   tconfig: Transient Configuration (e.g., per-session configuration)
           * not saved in NV-storage
           * included in <get-config>, <edit-config>, <copy-config>

   state: Non-Configuration Data
           * not saved in NV-storage
           * not included in <get-config>, <edit-config>, <copy-config>


> /jon


Andy


_______________________________________________
OPS-NM mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ops-nm