FW: BoF in Taipei
"Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ops |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A0403BE8EBF@307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com> |
Please see the message from Adrian about the Software Driven Networks (SDN) BOF approved for Taipei. As Adrian puts it ' The BoF is nominally in the Routing Area, but I expect considerable involvement from the OPS Area.' Scheduling will avoid conflict with the area meetings and to the possible extent to the other WGs in OPS whose participants could contribute to this work (OPSAWG, NETCONF, NETMOD, V6OPS). The mail list is at http://www.lucidvision.com/mailman/listinfo/sdnp -----Original Message----- From: Adrian Farrel [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2011 10:00 PM To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected]; Romascanu, Dan (Dan); [email protected] Subject: BoF in Taipei Hi SDN list, I wanted you to know that the IAB and IESG met today to discuss BoFs for Taipei. They have agreed that we will hold a BoF for SDN with a goal of "discussing the technology and identifying work items". The BoF is nominally in the Routing Area, but I expect considerable involvement from the OPS Area. That means that it will not be designated a "working group forming BoF". In other words, the objective of the meeting will not be to discuss the precise nature of what a new working group would do (charter, scope, milestones, documents). Rather, it will try to reach agreement on what the topic actually is, what work is out there, what belongs in the IETF, who wants to do what, and how it breaks into manageable units, etc.. We may find that the outcome is a clear new WG. We might find pieces of work that belong in different existing WGs. We might find that all the work actually belongs in another body. And we might find that there is no work to be done. Over the next couple of days I will work with Tom on an initial draft agenda for the meeting which we will put to you for more debate and bashing. We have a 2 hour slot, so we should be able to cover quite a lot. I will also appoint chairs for the BoF relatively soon so that they can take on a guiding role leading up to the meeting. OK? Adrian