Re: [OPS-DIR] FW: BoF in Taipei
Marshall Eubanks <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ops |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAJNg7V+Dr42QZk-odcc_chJKwmaLjMkSWD_wCr7NvVkWo73WWQ@mail.gmail.com> |
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 7:55 PM, Marshall Eubanks < [email protected]> wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 6:21 PM, Fred Baker <[email protected]> wrote: > >> OK, do me a favor. I sent a note to vpn4dc@, and have since forwarded it >> to l3vpn@. I'm not a member of the latter. So let it through... >> >> > Will do > > Done. You might want to follow this thread http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l3vpn/current/msg03072.html Marshall > Marshall > > >> On Nov 1, 2011, at 6:13 AM, Marshall Eubanks wrote: >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Fred Baker <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> what is the [email protected] list being used for? >>> >>> >> Not much at present. The VPN4DC BOF was turned into a special session of >> L3VPN, so I asked people not to use >> the BOF VPN4DC mailing list. >> >> I would assume that the disposition of the ML would be gated by the >> disposition of the work, which we >> don't know yet. There is some probability that this would become a >> standalone BOF / WG, so in that case it would find some use. >> >> Regards >> Marshall >> >> >> >>> On Oct 5, 2011, at 11:04 PM, Marshall Eubanks wrote: >>> >>> > Similarly, VPN4DC should be of interest to the OPS area. This was not >>> > approved as >>> > a BOF, but will be discussed in the L3VPN mailing list (now) and (if >>> > there is sufficient interest) >>> > in a L3VPN meeting in Taipei. >>> > >>> > You can find a brief description in >>> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/bof/trac/wiki >>> > >>> > Please direct discussion of VPN4DC to L3VPN. >>> > >>> > Regards >>> > Marshall Eubanks >>> > >>> > On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) >>> > <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >> Please see the message from Adrian about the Software Driven Networks >>> >> (SDN) BOF approved for Taipei. As Adrian puts it ' The BoF is >>> nominally >>> >> in the Routing Area, but I expect considerable involvement from the >>> OPS >>> >> Area.' Scheduling will avoid conflict with the area meetings and to >>> the >>> >> possible extent to the other WGs in OPS whose participants could >>> >> contribute to this work (OPSAWG, NETCONF, NETMOD, V6OPS). The mail >>> list >>> >> is at http://www.lucidvision.com/mailman/listinfo/sdnp >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> -----Original Message----- >>> >> From: Adrian Farrel [mailto:[email protected]] >>> >> Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2011 10:00 PM >>> >> To: [email protected] >>> >> Cc: [email protected]; Romascanu, Dan (Dan); [email protected] >>> >> Subject: BoF in Taipei >>> >> >>> >> Hi SDN list, >>> >> >>> >> I wanted you to know that the IAB and IESG met today to discuss BoFs >>> for >>> >> Taipei. >>> >> >>> >> They have agreed that we will hold a BoF for SDN with a goal of >>> >> "discussing the >>> >> technology and identifying work items". The BoF is nominally in the >>> >> Routing >>> >> Area, but I expect considerable involvement from the OPS Area. >>> >> >>> >> That means that it will not be designated a "working group forming >>> BoF". >>> >> In >>> >> other words, the objective of the meeting will not be to discuss the >>> >> precise >>> >> nature of what a new working group would do (charter, scope, >>> milestones, >>> >> documents). Rather, it will try to reach agreement on what the topic >>> >> actually >>> >> is, what work is out there, what belongs in the IETF, who wants to do >>> >> what, and >>> >> how it breaks into manageable units, etc.. >>> >> >>> >> We may find that the outcome is a clear new WG. We might find pieces >>> of >>> >> work >>> >> that belong in different existing WGs. We might find that all the work >>> >> actually >>> >> belongs in another body. And we might find that there is no work to be >>> >> done. >>> >> >>> >> Over the next couple of days I will work with Tom on an initial draft >>> >> agenda for >>> >> the meeting which we will put to you for more debate and bashing. We >>> >> have a 2 >>> >> hour slot, so we should be able to cover quite a lot. >>> >> >>> >> I will also appoint chairs for the BoF relatively soon so that they >>> can >>> >> take on >>> >> a guiding role leading up to the meeting. >>> >> >>> >> OK? >>> >> >>> >> Adrian >>> >> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >>> >> OPS-DIR mailing list >>> >> [email protected] >>> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ops-dir >>> >> >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > OPS-DIR mailing list >>> > [email protected] >>> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ops-dir >>> >>> >> >> > _______________________________________________ OPS-AREA mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ops-area