答复: Call for agenda items f or the OPSAREA open meeting atIETF-83

Hi Dan,

 

I submitted a draft several days ago regarding IP/MPLS interruption duration
draft-fan-opsawg-transmission-interuption-00
<http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-fan-opsawg-transmission-interuption/>
. I requested a time slot in opsawg, but was told they tended only to
allocate a slot after the draft had shown interest in the mailing list. This
document was submitted shortly before the Mar 5 deadline, so I guess I
didn’t leave enough time for people to read it.

 

Although the industry may have some existing perspectives on the matter of
interruption duration C for example sub-50ms-outage-time requirement for
physical transport layer C we think the requirement for IP/MPLS layer can
be alleviated to some extent as long as upper-level service connection is
not affected to be broken. That is the purpose of this document. To be more
specific, we consider IP interruption duration of 3 sec is ok for softswitch
voice. 

 

We would like to hear comments about this problem and initiate discussion
among industry on how far the IP layer can tolerate interruption while
provide uninterrupted connection for services. I really wish to have the
chance to talk about this issue during the meeting if the agenda is not so
fully scheduled. 10 minutes is enough if it is possible.

 

Thanks and best regards,

 

Fan Peng

 

 

-----邮件原件-----

发件人: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 代表
Romascanu, Dan (Dan)

发送时间: 2012年3月15日 2:01

收件人: Gene Golovinsky; [email protected]

抄送: [email protected]

主题: Re: [OPS-AREA] Call for agenda items for the OPSAREA open meeting
atIETF-83

 

Hi Gene,

 

The OPSAWG chairs agreed to allocate a time-slot in the OPSAWG section of
the meeting for this document. Please follow-up with them on the details and
most important please work with the other OPSAWG participants in order to
test their level of support and interest in participating in this work,
which will be the determinant factor in the decision to adopt it (or not) as
a WG item. 

 

Regards,

 

Dan

 

 

 

 

> -----Original Message-----

> From: Gene Golovinsky [mailto:[email protected]]

> Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 6:55 PM

> To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan); [email protected]

> Subject: RE: [OPS-AREA] Call for agenda items for the OPSAREA open 

> meeting atIETF-83

> 

> Hi.

> I was requesting 10 min slot for

> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-golovinsky-cloud-services-log-format-

> 01

> from OPSAWG. They are reluctant to grant it without seeing some active 

> discussion on the list and also probably because the agenda is packet 

> as it is.

> IMHO people have limited time for reading the drafts and the 

> presentation can generate active discussion.

> The draft itself lost a bit of a momentum due to inability of authors 

> to attend several previous meetings.

> 

> If at all possible, I would really appreciate the opportunity to talk 

> about the problem at hand and the possible solution.

> 

> Thanks.

> --Gene

> 

> 

> -----Original Message-----

> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 

> Behalf Of Romascanu, Dan (Dan)

> Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 08:56 AM

> To: [email protected]

> Subject: Re: [OPS-AREA] Call for agenda items for the OPSAREA open 

> meeting

> atIETF-83

> 

> Hi,

> 

> We did not receive until now any requests for agenda time at the 

> OPSAREA WG meeting.

> 

> By now we have only the open microphone session on the agenda.

> 

> Unless we receive any request in the next few days we may end up the 

> meeting early or donate time to the OPSAWG if they need it.

> 

> Thanks and Regards,

> 

> Dan and Ron

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> > -----Original Message-----

> > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]

On

> > Behalf Of Romascanu, Dan (Dan)

> > Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2012 6:06 PM

> > To: [email protected]

> > Subject: [OPS-AREA] Call for agenda items for the OPSAREA open

> meeting

> > atIETF-83

> >

> > IETF-83 is only two month away. We are planning again for a joint 

> > OPSAWG and OPSAREA open meeting, with the OPSAWG work items driving 

> > most of the agenda. The more general cross-area items or those

> related

> > to the relation between work in the area and work out of the IETF 

> > should be part of the OPSAREA section. Please send us your requests 

> > for presentation and discussion slots.

> >

> > Thanks and Regards,

> >

> > Dan and Ron

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > _______________________________________________

> > OPS-AREA mailing list

> > [email protected]

> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ops-area

> _______________________________________________

> OPS-AREA mailing list

> [email protected]

> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ops-area

 

_______________________________________________

OPS-AREA mailing list

[email protected]

https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ops-area

_______________________________________________
OPS-AREA mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ops-area