Re: Feedbacks request on draft-galimbe-kunze-g-698-2-snmp-mib-02

On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 06:54:22PM +0200, Gabriele Maria Galimberti (ggalimbe) wrote:
> 
> After having discuss with Chris, we kindly request your feedbacks on the
> draft in object.
> 
> This draft is focused on Optical Parameters definition and proposes a
> SNMP MIB to manage them.
> 
> It has been already submitted and discussed in ccamp, good feedbacks
> from the content point of view, 
> 
> Nevertheless ccamp recommended to ask for comments also from SNMP point
> of view.
> 
> In the document you can find the references to G.698.2 (the ITU-T
> optical parameters recommendation)
> 
> And the kunze-g-698-2-management-control-framework that explain in some
> way the usage of the MIB (and more).

Well, its a long MIB. You should really not use a module name already
in use and a module registration you do not own. I also strongly
suggest to do an editorial pass over it to achieve a consistent layout
and indentation. Tools tend to extract strings and they pay attention
to indentation and such things. Is Integer32 always the right data
type? Can you have negative power etc? The copyright says 2003 and the
text says it is part of RFC 3591 and the ATOM WG. I think a serious
editorial pass over the document is needed before this should be
reviewed.

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany
Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>