Documenting rules for the Private Enterprise Numbers registry: draft-liang-iana-pen-00
Alexey Melnikov <[email protected]> Tue, 08 May 2012 21:35:16 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ops |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, Benoit suggested that I post this email message here. draft-liang-iana-pen is trying to formalize and document rules for the Private Enterprise Numbers registry <http://www.iana.org/assignments/enterprise-numbers>. In particular the purpose of this document is to document a) what is allowed to be registered (what characters should be allowed in an Enterprise name, what is an Enterprise) b) under what conditions an entry can be changed and what kind of documentation is required. The document is being worked on by IANA (Pearl with some help from Michelle), I was asked to help out. While the document is mostly documenting existing practice, it is also trying to specify some rules about how the registry is to be operated, because certain (most?) things were never written down. Pearl and I will appreciate reviews and feedback on the document. One of the major issues is currently outstanding is "what is considered to be an Enterprise?". While Universities and non profit organizations are considered Enterprises, it is not very clear whether different departments of a University, or subsidiaries of the same bank in different countries are considered to be different enterprises or not. A more difficult case is whether to allow different products from the same vendor to be allocated different PENs. Yet another example is allocation of special PENs for RFCs (e.g. RFC 5103.html, section 6.1). Is this Ok? (All of these are examples of what people asked to register.) As currently there is no guidelines, there is no way for IANA to say "no". Somewhat related to this: another position might be that there are enough PENs for everyone and that there is really no need to be restrictive in the case of this registry. Any feedback would be appreciated. Thank you, Alexey