Re: Feedbacks request on draft-galimbe-kunze-g-698-2-snmp-mib-02
"Gabriele Maria Galimberti (ggalimbe)" <[email protected]> Sat, 23 Jun 2012 16:46:56 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ops |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Dear Juergen and ops-area team, We have posted a new draft (attached) in substitution of draft-galimbe-kunze-g-698-2-snmp-mib-02. The two docs. differences reflect the comments we have received and the file name (to comply with ccamp naming). We appreciate any comment and suggestion before the IETF docs dead line submission. Best regards, The Authors -----Original Message----- From: Juergen Schoenwaelder [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 30 March 2012 23:22 To: Gabriele Maria Galimberti (ggalimbe) Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; Lou Berger; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: [OPS-AREA] Feedbacks request on draft-galimbe-kunze-g-698-2-snmp-mib-02 On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 06:54:22PM +0200, Gabriele Maria Galimberti (ggalimbe) wrote: > > After having discuss with Chris, we kindly request your feedbacks on the > draft in object. > > This draft is focused on Optical Parameters definition and proposes a > SNMP MIB to manage them. > > It has been already submitted and discussed in ccamp, good feedbacks > from the content point of view, > > Nevertheless ccamp recommended to ask for comments also from SNMP point > of view. > > In the document you can find the references to G.698.2 (the ITU-T > optical parameters recommendation) > > And the kunze-g-698-2-management-control-framework that explain in some > way the usage of the MIB (and more). Well, its a long MIB. You should really not use a module name already in use and a module registration you do not own. I also strongly suggest to do an editorial pass over it to achieve a consistent layout and indentation. Tools tend to extract strings and they pay attention to indentation and such things. Is Integer32 always the right data type? Can you have negative power etc? The copyright says 2003 and the text says it is part of RFC 3591 and the ATOM WG. I think a serious editorial pass over the document is needed before this should be reviewed. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ OPS-AREA mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ops-area
draft-galikunze-ccamp-g-698-2-snmp-mib-00.txt
(text/plain, 134.9 KB) - not displayed