Re: configuration: writable MIB modules versus NETCONF/YANG modules

Balazs Lengyel <[email protected]> wrote:
> The updates are not persistent, they are operational state.

If you want to model your data in a MIB, it seems SNMP works fine for
this use case.

If you want to model your data in YANG, a "custom rpc" can be defined
for the data modification, and NETCONF or RESTCONF can be used to
invoke the custom rpc.


/martin



> Balazs
> 
> On 2014-02-14 15:36, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 03:34:09PM +0100, Balazs Lengyel wrote:
> >>     Hello Benoit,
> >>     We have a use case that might end up in an IETF RFC, which involves
> >>     updating a small set of data very frequently (2 times/sec).
> >>     It is kind of on the border of configuration and SDN/routing.
> >>     What would be a good protocol for this purpose? Is it still Netconf, or a
> >>     custom protocol?
> > Are the updates persistent or are you modifying operational state?
> >
> > /js
> >
> 
> -- 
> Balazs Lengyel                       Ericsson Hungary Ltd.
> System Manager
> ECN: 831 7320                        Tel: +36-1-437-7320
> Mobile: +36-70-330-7909              email: [email protected]
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OPS-AREA mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ops-area
>