configuration: writable MIB modules versus NETCONF/YANG modules

>> Dear all,
>>
>> We occasionally see read-write MIB module proposals within the IETF.
>> However, the write capabilities of those MIB modules are rarely
>> implemented.
>>
>> While discussing this issue with the MIB doctors, we arrive to the
>> conclusion that it's now time to set the direction for future MIB
>> developments within the IETF. Basically, let's not specify read-write
>> MIB modules unless we have a good reason. Read-only MIB modules
>> are still fine though, as SNMP is clearly used for monitoring purposes.
>>
>> Here is the statement we came up with:
>>
>> The OPS area recommends the use of NETCONF/YANG standards for
>> configuration. IETF working groups are therefore encouraged to use the
>> NETCONF/YANG standards for configuration, specifically in new
>> charters. SNMP MIB modules modifying persistent configuration state
>> should only be produced by working groups in cases of clear utility
>> and consensus to use SNMP write operations for configuration.
>>
I>> deally, this should become an IESG statement.
>> Your feedback is most welcome.
>>
>> Regards, the MIB doctors & Benoit

Eminently reasonable and needed.

+1

--dmm