Re: configuration: writable MIB modules versus NETCONF/YANG modules

Benoit Claise writes:
> Here is the statement we came up with:

>     The OPS area recommends the use of NETCONF/YANG standards for
>     configuration. IETF working groups are therefore encouraged to
>     use the NETCONF/YANG standards for configuration, specifically
>     in new charters. SNMP MIB modules modifying persistent
>     configuration state should only be produced by working groups in
>     cases of clear utility and consensus to use SNMP write
>     operations for configuration.

> Ideally, this should become an IESG statement.
> Your feedback is most welcome.

Agree - it's time for such a statement, and this is a good one.
It doesn't make any recommendations about monitoring or notifications.
I think that (absence) is also appropriate at this point.
-- 
Simon.